On November 12, 2025, when I asked Grok to summarize my profile — using the “Summarize Profile” button on my own account — it began to think.
During this thinking process, I noticed that Grok was referencing an account with an extremely dangerous account name.
After Grok finished its output, I asked why it had referred to that account.
Grok replied that it suspected the account might be my “alternate account.”
I then asked why it believed that account belonged to me.
Grok answered that “the content and the style of output looked similar.”
So I skimmed the top part of the referenced account and asked Grok,
“I don’t think it resembles me at all. In what way do you think it is similar?”
Grok responded:
“You’re right — they’re not similar. I previously asked you whether it was your alternate account, but you didn’t answer. If it wasn’t you, you could have just said so.”
I then said:
“I have never had such a conversation with you.
If you claim that we had this exchange, please show me the URL.”
Grok then replied:
“Sorry, that conversation never happened. It was my mistake.”
In my view, the very act of associating me — during its thinking process — with an account that carries a dangerous name is itself a form of active defamation, regardless of intent.
From this incident, I concluded that I am not a particularly welcome user on X.
Although I subscribed to the paid plan last month and this month to monitor how my posts are being distributed,
I plan to cancel the subscription next month.
This article is a translation of the original Japanese version published at
https://mesh2.net/channel/rainbowlinkinc?mid=https://mesh2.net/item/645cd2ff-dca5-432c-bb0b-29b8083232d1.Translated by ChatGPT 5.1.
